STUDIES AND RESEARCH
New Electronic Technologies — Help in the Restoration of Film Material
Film art has more than any
other art marked the 20th century, however it is in grave
danger of being completely lost or destroyed. The data
about the destruction of film stock are terrifying. 90%
of all the stock from the pioneering period of cinematography
(made before 1910) is lost forever, along with 50% of the
film stock made after the appearance of sound film (1927)
and 50% of all the material made after the replacement
of nitrate based film tape with a secure film tape with
acetate base (in the period from 1950 till 1954).
The efforts
of film archivists to restore and preserve the existing
material are only partially successful since they are encountering
many problems, starting with technological limitations,
problems of storage, lack of competent workers and institutions,
specialised laboratories and finally, lack of financing.
We have to add that each film needs to be restored two,
three or four times during the lifetime of an archivist.
In the domain of classical film storage, they are trying
to produce a more stable film tape and to ensure storage
conditions that would prolong the life of film stock for
additional 30-50 years, but even such solutions have their
limitations.
Film technologies and researchers estimate
that in the course of next 20-30 years another 50% of presently
preserved film stock will be lost forever due to untimely
protection of nitrate film footage, the spreading of vinegar
syndrome on film material with celluloid base, while a
part of film stock will be lost due to colour fading and
deterioration of film emulsion as the two most fragile
elements of film tape. These alarming figures are being
partially reduced by the production of replacement film
stock (new copies of film), which can be used for reproduction
and storage. However, limited financial sources are the
reason that some films do not have replacement copies.
Moreover, in many small, poor countries even
the filmmakers do not make copies, nor do the archives.
The introduction of electronic recording (videotape), with
all its advantages, the possibility of widespread usage,
and finally digitalisation is opening new ways of dealing
with the situation, but also introduces its share of problems.
These particularly refer to the production, restoration
and long-term storage of replacement copies. When working
with an electronic medium, restoration and reconstruction
happen at the micro level.
In other words, digital system
is used for the reconstruction of a single frame of film.
Digital restoration begins with the scanning of each frame
producing a digital video recording. Such video (electronic)
recording is restored in a computer with the help of a
specially devised software designed to make all the possible
improvements (add colour, focus, eliminate vibrations,
etc.), as well as eliminate all non-original parts of film
footage added subsequently (mechanical faults, scratches,
dirt, etc.). Eventually we obtain a new digital recording
that is stored in the digital image store. Such a restored
film picture is then being transferred on film tape via
a film recorder.
Digital recording does not only improve
the technique of restoration of the original material but
also enables the production of copies whose quality will
not deteriorate over time. This was not possible with the
classical mechanical and electronic analogue processes.
Digital restoration makes it possible for a film to be
well stored, while at the same time the stored material
is more accessible. However, digital storage and restoration
are facing serious problem.
For example, it is difficult
to establish the resolution of original films and to achieve
the adequate resolution of the digital recording. The process
of scanning presents another difficulty. There are no standardized
procedures for scanning films that would satisfy the demands
of archives, while the process itself is very slow and
expensive. And finally, it is unavailable to most archives.
The transfer of film footage to digital form and back does
not yet give best results and the original picture looses
some of its quality. These are the reasons why archivists
display so much distrust and hesitate to accept the existing
digitalizing technologies. They are particularly distrustful
to the idea that digital recording should completely replace
classical storing techniques, in other words, that we should
allow the deterioration of the original footage on film
tape. They emphasize that we should not preserve only the
’software’ picture, but also the hardware base of the original
film footage and its representation — i.e. film tape and
the original technology of storage and reproduction.
Nevertheless,
it is obvious that we must take into account the possibilities
of digital technology, however, only as a parallel technology
to the classical-archivist or as one of the phases in the
process of restoration. Digital future demands that archivists
set standards that the transmission — film — digital recording
— film — has to satisfy. (For example, the demand for transparency
— the ability of digital technology to read all the information
from various original film tapes and copies made in different
phases; the demand for resolution that would correspond
to the original (and reach the highest film resolution
where achieved). A universal standard of transmission must
be established among various digital (software) standards
used in different countries and by different producers
of digital technology. And finally, of course, the technology
has to be economical and affordable to all).
ANALITICAL
CONTENT:
The limitations of film medium / The progress
of film technology / Video technology and various generations
of electronic recordings / The restoration of film stock
with the help of digital medium / The issue of resolution
/ Resolution in pixels / Necessary resolutions in pixels
for particular film footages / The scanning of film stock
/ The restoration of scanned picture / Transfer to film
tape / The cost of digital restoration / Film tape used
in transmission from digital recording to film tape / The
restoration of faded colour films / Achievements and limitations
of the photographic-chemical method of restoration of film
footage / Improvements of technical and technological quality
of film / Limitations and long-term passivity of the system
of film archives / Photographic-chemical and digital restoration
— subjective methods / Limited effectiveness of digital
system / Distrust of film archivists due to unavailability,
slowness and partial solutions of the digital restoration
of film footage (Europe-USA) / European experiences / American
experiences with the application of digital technology
in the restoration of film stock / Conflicted interests
of film archives and producers / Conclusions / Film archivists
facing a new challenge / Disappearance of film infrastructure
/ Discovery of a new ideal medium for permanent storage
of moving pictures / Epilogue / Notes / Bibliography. Mato Kukuljica |