Ideology and denial
Their Reckoning With Me
The article is a sort of personal reminder
about the political campaign against the history book written
by the author of the article — Betwixt the Audience and
the State — A History of Croatian Cinema 1896-1980 (Zagreb:
Znanje 1984).
The book came out in print in November of 1984. Some
review copies were distributed in advance in order to enable
timed journalistic reactions. Advance reactions were actually
attained, but what reactions! An ideological campaign was
raised against the book and the author. This paper offers
a personal chronicle of some of the most important phases
and points in the campaign. In the first phase, the first
attack on the book was made in the main political daily Vjesnik,
by its film reviewer Mira Boglić. Škrabalo’s basic attitude
in the book was described as an aversive obsession with
the socialist state.
The book was described as a pamphlet
and it was asserted that the writing of the history was
just a pretext for the »creation of an unrealistic, inconsistent
and contradictory image about the conditions surrounding
the development of Croatian film«. The author’s reply was
published a week later in Vjesnik, accusing Boglić
of political denunciation. The author stated that if Boglić’s
interpretation was true, the book could be subjected to
criminal persecution. He requested that Boglić withdraw
her assessment that the book represents Škrablo’s »show-down
with socialist society«. Boglić’s subsequent reaction in Vjesnik added
strength to the accusations, marking Škrabalo as a member
of the Croatian nationalists, and reaffirmed her original
assessment of the book. The second phase was a trial in
which Škrabalo sued Boglić for libel. The judge ruled in
Boglić’s favor, taking her assessment of the book to be
a matter of free (and subjective) expression of opinion.
In the meantime a »Film Culture critical round-table«
(Film Culture being the only
film magazine in Croatia) was organized by the Center for
Marxist Studies of the Central Committee of the Communist
Party of Croatia. The invitation to the round table was
written in an accusatorial tone, so the author, internal
reviewers and some other invited people refused to show
up and take part in the discussion. On the other hand most
of those filmmakers and film critics that participated
in the round table discussion accepted the signal and made
their own contribution to the persecution of the book.
The author quotes characteristic personal contributions
to the discussion at the round table. The exposition at
the round-table was published in the next Film Culture issue,
and had some aftereffects in journals. However the long-term
consequences were not so bad. The concluding round table
remark by Mira Boglić that »the biggest danger coming from
the book is that it could be accepted by young film critics,
essayists and journalists as something reliable, truthful
and authoritative« was happily fulfilled in succeeding
years. Ivo Škrabalo |