Studies and research: discussion about postmodernism
Adding More Confusion to what is (not) Postmodern Cinema
For most people postmodernism represents
an artistic style that possesses certain structural characteristics.
For the author, postmodernism is a philosophical definition
of a worldview that can only be addressed in a continuum
— pre-modern, modern, and postmodern. The very core of
postmodernism is that one cannot define it into an absolute
category. The pre-modern view is rooted in a sacred redemption;
which is a philosophical belief that all epistemological
questions are in the hands of some divine power. The pre-modern
film may, more often than not, present a sacred redemptionistic
narrative within the form of one or more synergetic, linear
patterns of acts. Humankind (at least in the normative,
western, Judeo-Christian context) will be born fallible
and mortal and, within the film, will be redeemed or not
redeemed from this lot via some sort of divine grace.
Films
such as: Ten Commandments (divine powers of Jewish
God), The Exorcist (showcase — Satan vs. God), Star
Wars saga (metaphor for divine powers of Christianity
— father Dart Wader, son Luke Skywalker, holy spirit The
Force), 2001/2010 saga (an unknown divine power
sends the monolith and saves the humanity), Little Buddha (divine
powers of Buddha), The Fifth Element (divinity saves
the Earth through the powers of five elements), The
Matrix (Jesus has come back in the image of Keanu
Revees), Magnolia (God
sends frog-rain reminding humanity to stop behaving badly),
etc. all paradigmatically exemplify pre-modern philosophical
worldview.
On the other hand, modern view is rooted in
secular redemption; which is a philosophical belief that
humanity is the most significant thing in the anthropocentric
universe. Progressive civilization will be able to find
perfection and truth through its own advances in science
and technology, without any help from divine powers. Films
such as: War Games (humans and computer save the
world from the thermo-nuclear war), Star Trek films (humans
act as some sort of space police), Schindler’s List (redemption
of the Jewish nation), Independence Day (humans
defeat the aliens and save the planet), James Bond films
(007 saves the planet repeatedly), Terminator films
(humans triumph over the machines), Rambo saga (nothing
defeats extraordinary human feats), Back to the Future
saga (humans control the past and the future via
technology), The
Truman Show (TV producer creates a virtual world
and acts as God), etc, all paradigmatically exemplify
modern philosophical worldview.
On the other hand,
postmodern view is rooted in a-redemption (agnostic)
or anti-redemption (atheist) philosophical beliefs.
These beliefs replace the truth with contextual truthfulness
that represents the most pragmatic way of dealing with
reality and the absurdness of human condition in the
vast and dynamic universe. The humankind’s attempts
to gain control and make meaning of such complexity
and contradiction are horrendously limited to a bricolage
of temporarily available information (the truthfulness).
Therefore, the most important signs for the pre-modern
and modern views, such as God, perfection, and truth;
are regarded by postmodernists as ever changing from
existential situation to existential situation. Since
the absolute truth is of no importance, the focus is put
on small local neighborhoods within which there is a possibility
of bricolage — limited meaning making, grasping the reality
inside the contextual truthfulness — not the absolute truth.
Through this postmodern approach, mega-narratives of redemption,
such as pre-modern religious narratives, and modern anthropocentric
technological pursuits, are replaced with mini-narratives
that allow only small redemption and consequently small
tragedy. Thus, human condition is considered comedic rather
than tragic.
Films such as: Jesus of Montreal, Don
Juan De Marco, To Die For, Mighty Aphrodite, Pret-A-Porter, All
That Jazz, Galaxy Quest, etc. all paradigmatically
exemplify postmodern philosophical worldview. However,
it is important to understand that postmodern film, as
the author views it, does have a place for small t — tragedy
and small r — redemption. This is best exemplified in films
like: Fried Green Tomatoes, Educating Rita, Rumbling
Rose, Places in Hearths, Driving Miss Daisy, What’s
Eating Gilbert Grape, etc.
There are those postmodernists
who will dispute the validity of this category and insist
that even the smallest humankind’s triumphs and disappointments
merit nothing but strict comedic and aredemptionistic interpretation,
but author believes that small cannot only be beautiful,
but tragic and redemptive as well. Close analysis of Robert
Altman’s Short Cuts serves to show how the use of
certain structural elements in film exemplifies and reinforces
the described postmodern worldview.
The pinpointed elements
of the Altman’s film are: discontinuity, reflexivity, collage,
eclecticism, double coding, parody, pastiche, irony, contradiction
and complexification, and by far the most important ones
— big C — Comedy, small t — tragedy, big A — Aredemptionism,
and small r — redemption. Mladen Miličević |